![]() ![]() ![]() I think it’s something that we all share up here. HINES: Well, ma’am, that’s a - that’s a great question. And we’ve been talking with folks, of course, around the country about what you all are doing.Ĭan you share, for those who have not been on the International Space Station: How does it impact your view of Earth when you’ve had that experience? Does it change your view of Earth and your perception of who we are who live on Earth? THE VICE PRESIDENT: You know, I’ve invited some students to join us today. And we really appreciate you and the Space Council and everyone there - the support that you all have for the human spaceflight program. I’m so thrilled to be with each one of you. THE VICE PRESIDENT: I am so excited to be with you all as Vice President, as the head of the Space Council, and as an American who is a space nerd. It’s great to see you at JSC and an honor to speak with you from the International Space Station. LINGREN: Madam Vice President, we have you loud and clear. Get Involved Show submenu for “Get Involved””.The White House Show submenu for “The White House””.Office of the United States Trade Representative.Office of Science and Technology Policy.Executive Offices Show submenu for “Executive Offices””.Administration Show submenu for “Administration””.Hundreds of defunct spacecraft, including Russia’s Mir space station, have previously been ditched in that isolated part of the Pacific. Point Nemo - a spot that’s situated between New Zealand and the coast of Chile, 1,670 miles away from the nearest speck of land - would be the target point for falling debris. Ground controllers would manage the station’s descent so that the final, fiery plunge through the atmosphere occurred in early 2031 over a “spacecraft cemetery” known as the South Pacific Oceanic Uninhabited Area. Other spacecraft, perhaps including Northrop Grumman’s Cygnus cargo ship, might also play a part.Ī crew would be aboard the station for the initial months of the deorbit operation, but the latter stages would be executed remotely after the last crew’s departure, toward the end of 2030. ![]() NASA’s current scenario calls for three Russian-built Progress supply spacecraft to fire their thrusters while docked to the station for a months-long deorbit operation. The report lays out a plan for shifting operations to those new outposts and gradually lowering the orbit of the old station’s remaining modules during the latter half of the 2020s, building up to a climax in 2030. Some of the space station’s modules could be split off to become part of other orbital outposts during the transition. NASA expects to select at least one commercial space station project in 2025 to be certified to host its astronauts for future missions. Yet another company, Axiom Space, is already building a commercial module for the ISS that’s meant eventually to become the springboard for a stand-alone space station. In December, NASA awarded a total of $415.6 million to three commercial teams - headed by Jeff Bezos’ Blue Origin space venture, Nanoracks and Northrop Grumman - to start working on concepts for commercial space stations suitable for low Earth orbit, or LEO. NASA said the members of the 15-nation space station partnership would work together “to ensure there is no threat to the long-term viability of the ISS.” At the same time, the report acknowledged that the station can’t last forever. Meanwhile, Russian space officials are continuing to assess how their part of the station is holding up, with special attention being given to an air leak in the Russian-built Zvezda service module. NASA says its portion of the space station should be structurally sound at least that long. The updated report comes a month after NASA announced the Biden administration’s decision to extend the station’s operating lifetime from 2024 to 2030. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |